# AROA Agency vs Aura Management: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, AROA Agency and Aura Management both score 3.8/10 on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (#17 and #18 of 31; 1 vs 0 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (AROA Agency) and October 20, 2026 (Aura Management) ## How do AROA Agency and Aura Management differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: AROA Agency publishes more than Aura Management on 2: dated history (C11, in part vs not found) and scope and fit (C12, in full vs in part). Aura Management publishes more than AROA Agency on 2: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in part vs not found) and where the money goes (C07, in part vs not found). - Commission base: AROA Agency does not state it; Aura Management takes it from net earnings. - Payouts go to the creator: Aura Management states it; AROA Agency does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Company named on the site: AROA Agency: none stated; Aura Management: GWB Pty Ltd (Australia). Where they publish the same: no minimum term. ## AROA Agency and Aura Management key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [AROA Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aroa-agency/) | [Aura Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aura-management/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Not published. The homepage says that after the initial call the agency presents financial options, such as a revenue split. | Not published. FAQ says commission is agreed after the initial consultation and depends on social media presence and account size; a blog post says the agency receives a percentage of net earnings. | | Commission base | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | No exit fees or penalties stated (legal page, homepage); setup, retainer, tool, ad-spend and content costs are not addressed | FAQ says contracts do not contain 'nasty clauses about fees'; no list of fees or amounts. 'Professional Invoicing' and 'OnlyFans Accounting' are listed as features without saying whether they cost extra. | | Minimum term | Cancel anytime, zero penalties; no long-term contracts (homepage); no term length stated | None stated as a lock-in: FAQ says creators are not locked in and can cancel the agreement any time | | Notice to end | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | Renewal / how the term continues | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | Payments after you leave | Not stated (legal page says the contract can be ended at any time with no fees) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | Account login | Not stated. Homepage says 'you have all the control'; a blog post says the team manages creator accounts through a central CRM and an antidetect browser. | Not stated who holds credentials. How-we-work page says client data and content are accessed only by the assigned account manager, who takes over daily account management. | | Where payouts land | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | FAQ: weekly payouts from the creator's account directly into the creator's nominated bank account. Commission collection method not stated. | | Country | United States (Miami, Florida address in the footer) | Australia (homepage: 'Australian Registered and Owned Company'; website terms governed by New South Wales law) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: AROA Agency and Aura Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [AROA Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aroa-agency/) | [Aura Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aura-management/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 3.8/10 | 3.8/10 | | Rank | #17 of 31 | #18 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **1** of 12 in full · 7 partly published, 4 not found | **0** of 12 in full · 9 partly published, 3 not found | | Band | Publishes few key terms | Publishes few key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 A blog post on the agency's site says its commission is a percentage of net earnings. The income types the percentage applies to are not stated. Quote: “we receive a percentage of net earnings” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Partial 5/10 The legal page says the contract can be ended at any time without fees, and the homepage says there are no penalties for cancelling. Setup or onboarding fees, retainers, tool fees, ad spend and content costs are not addressed. Quote: “End your contract whenever you want — no fees, no friction.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the agency's contracts contain no 'nasty' fee clauses. It does not list which charges besides the commission exist or are excluded (setup, retainers, tools, ad spend, content costs, exit fees). Quote: “our contracts are not lock in nor do they contain any nasty clauses about fees” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says there are no long-term contracts and that the creator can cancel at any time. No minimum term in months, notice period or renewal rule is stated. Quote: “No hidden clauses – cancel anytime, zero penalties.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says creators are not locked in and can cancel the agreement at any time. No notice period is given and automatic renewal is not addressed. Quote: “you are not locked into our services” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Partial 5/10 The legal page gives a general exit statement (end the contract at any time, no fees). It does not say whether any commission continues on income earned after the end date. Quote: “End your contract whenever you want — no fees, no friction.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says a creator can cancel the agreement at any time. It does not say whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “you are able to cancel your agreement any time” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Partial 5/10 The homepage gives a general statement that the creator keeps control. It does not say who holds the account password, email or 2FA. A blog post says the team manages creator accounts through a central CRM and the Dolphin Anty antidetect browser. Quote: “Plus, you have all the control.” | Partial 5/10 The how-we-work page says a dedicated manager takes over daily management of the account and that only the assigned account manager accesses client data and content. It does not say who holds the password, account email and 2FA. Quote: “Client data and content is accessed exclusively by your assigned account manager.” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says payouts from the creator's account go weekly into the creator's nominated bank account, and that the agency carries out the payout. It does not say how the agency's commission is collected. Quote: “We conduct weekly payouts of your account directly into your nominated bank account.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The legal page says the creator's content is the creator's property. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies and access when the engagement ends. Quote: “Your content = your property.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the creator keeps ownership of their content before and after working with Aura. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies and access when the engagement ends. Quote: “Will I retain ownership of my content before and after Aura? Absolutely.” | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Partial 5/10 The footer names only the brand 'Aroa Agency' with a street address in Miami, Florida, United States. No legal entity name (for example an LLC or Inc.) or registration statement is given. Quote: “8101 Biscayne Blvd. Ph 703-24 Miami, FL 33138” | Partial 5/10 The terms page names GWB Pty Ltd trading as Aura Management, with ABN 94 661 065 989 and ACN 661 065 989, and the homepage says it is an Australian registered company. The footer on every page names a different entity, 'Aura Management Pty Ltd', so the two statements conflict (E4). Quote: “owned and operated by GWB Pty Ltd trading as Aura Management” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The about page says the agency has helped models in the adult industry since 2014. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2021-10-11 (first Wayback capture 2021-11-26), more than 12 months later. Quote: “We’ve helped models thrive in the adult industry since 2014.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The homepage lists what the agency does: branding, a 24/7 chatting team, content calendars and shoots, growth strategy, sales optimisation, traffic, and legal and accounting support. The referral FAQ says it looks for women or trans women with potential and some industry experience or affinity. Quote: “women or trans women with potential, strong work ethic, and motivation” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ lists the services: daily account management, content scheduling and guidance, posting, DM management, monetisation, monthly audits and marketing. No exclusion or creator-fit limit is stated; the FAQ says newcomers are welcome and services are not limited to erotic content. Quote: “Meticulous daily management of your OnlyFans account.” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [AROA Agency profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aroa-agency/) · [Aura Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aura-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: AROA Agency vs Aura Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aroa-agency-vs-aura-management/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aroa-agency-vs-aura-management/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA