# Aruna Talent vs Foxy Studios: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, Aruna Talent and Foxy Studios both score 7.1/10 on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (#6 and #7 of 31; 6 vs 5 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Aruna Talent) and October 20–22, 2026 (Foxy Studios) ## How do Aruna Talent and Foxy Studios differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: Aruna Talent publishes more than Foxy Studios on 3: contract length and notice (C04, in full vs in part), payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part) and account access (C06, in full vs in part). Foxy Studios publishes more than Aruna Talent on 3: price on the page (C01, in part vs not found), what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part) and content rights (C08, in full vs in part). - Commission: Aruna Talent publishes no rate; Foxy Studios publishes standard flat split 45% of net. - No commission after you leave: Aruna Talent states it; Foxy Studios does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Payouts go to the creator: Aruna Talent states it; Foxy Studios does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Notice to end: Aruna Talent: 30 days' written notice; Foxy Studios: Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide). - Company named on the site: Aruna Talent: Aruna Talent LLC (Wyoming, United States); Foxy Studios: Javór GmbH (Switzerland). Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; the creator keeps the login; no charges besides the commission; no fixed term that renews itself. ## Aruna Talent and Foxy Studios key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [Foxy Studios](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/foxy-studios/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Not published. The site says its share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee, and that the exact split is laid out on the discovery call. | Standard flat split 45% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | None stated: no upfront cost, no setup fees, no monthly retainer or bill, nothing on top of the share, no exit fee; mentors included, not a paid add-on | None stated: terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split; fees article says no setup fees, retainers, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission; homepage says no penalties for leaving. | | Minimum term | None (no minimum term) | None (month-to-month, no lock-in) | | Notice to end | 30 days' written notice | Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide) | | Renewal / how the term continues | No automatic renewal | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | | Payments after you leave | None (no commission after the creator leaves) | Not stated. Terms say account credentials, content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. | | Account login | Creator keeps the login; a blog post says the written agreement sets team access through platform-native features with no primary credentials | Pages differ: the ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts, content and logins; the terms say the agency hands back account credentials in its possession within 14 days of termination. How the team accesses accounts is not described. | | Where payouts land | Homepage: OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name. Referral FAQ: payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal. How the agency's share is collected is not stated. | Contact FAQ: the agency handles all processing and the creator receives a 55% share weekly; the fees article describes monthly reconciliation against OnlyFans payout statements. The account where platform payouts land is not named. | | Country | United States (LLC registered in Wyoming per the about page) | Switzerland (headquarters stated as Baar) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: Aruna Talent and Foxy Studios side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [Foxy Studios](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/foxy-studios/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 7.1/10 | 7.1/10 | | Rank | #6 of 31 | #7 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **6** of 12 in full · 5 partly published, 1 not found | **5** of 12 in full · 7 partly published, 0 not found | | Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes some key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The standard rate is published: the agency takes 45% and the creator keeps 55%. An elite tier with improved splits for creators earning $50,000+/month is offered without a figure, and the fees article describes unpriced bespoke terms at about $150,000+/month. The same FAQ says 55/45 is the only split and applies to every creator (E4). Quote: “creators keep 55% and Foxy Studios takes 45%” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says the agency's share is calculated on net earnings, after the platform's 20% fee. It does not say which income types (subscriptions, messages/PPV, tips, other) the share applies to. Quote: “Our share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee” | Full 10/10 The fees article says the 45% is taken from post-OnlyFans revenue (what remains after the platform's 20%), gives worked examples on the whole post-platform amount, and says PPV is included at the standard split with no separate PPV commission. Chargebacks come out of gross before the split. Quote: “gross minus 20% platform, then 55% to you and 45% to Foxy” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says there is no upfront cost, no setup fee, no monthly retainer or bill and no exit fee, and that nothing is charged on top of the revenue share; mentors are included rather than a paid add-on. Quote: “We charge nothing upfront and nothing on top” | Full 10/10 The site says the split is the whole pricing model: the terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split, and the fees article says there are no setup fees, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission and that everything listed is covered by the 45%. The homepage says there are no penalties for leaving. Quote: “No setup fees. No retainers. No PPV stacking.” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ, answering "How long is the contract?", says there is no minimum term, that the partnership continues as long as both sides are winning, and that the creator leaves on 30 days' notice with no exit fee. The guide on its own no-contract approach repeats no minimum term and 30 days' written notice. Quote: “Our partnership continues as long as we’re both winning.” | Partial 5/10 The terms say Foxy works on a month-to-month basis, so the agreement continues each month until notice is given. They also say there is no long-term lock-in and either party may end the agreement with 30 days' written notice, and the homepage FAQ repeats the 30 days. A guide for European creators instead gives 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days. The notice periods therefore differ between pages (E4). Quote: “month-to-month basis. Either party may terminate the management agreement with 30 days written notice.” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ says no commission is charged after the creator leaves. Quote: “and there is no commission after you leave” | Partial 5/10 The terms say what is handed back within 14 days of termination, but no page says whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “On termination we will hand back account credentials, content libraries” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Full 10/10 The homepage says the creator keeps her login. A blog post says the written agreement covers team access through platform-native features, without the primary credentials. Quote: “team access provisions (platform-native features, no primary credentials)” | Partial 5/10 The ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts and logins, while the terms say the agency will hand back account credentials in its possession on termination, so the pages differ on who holds credentials (E4). How the team accesses the accounts is not described. Quote: “Creators keep their accounts, content, and logins. Always.” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name, while the referral FAQ says payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal (E4). How the agency collects its share is not stated. Quote: “You keep your login, OnlyFans pays you directly” | Partial 5/10 The contact FAQ says the agency handles all payment processing and pays the creator's 55% share weekly, so the commission is taken as a split. The site does not name the account where platform payouts land. Quote: “We handle all processing and you receive your share weekly.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The terms say creators keep ownership of their original content, and a blog post says the agreement states 100% creator ownership. What happens to the agency's copies and access at the end is not stated. Quote: “Creators retain ownership of their original content.” | Full 10/10 The terms say intellectual property in creator content stays with the creator, that agency deliverables are licensed to the creator during the engagement, and that content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. Quote: “intellectual property rights in creator content remain with the creator” | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. A blog section on the agency's own agreement lists what is agreed in writing: commission base, service scope, 30-day notice, content ownership and team access. Quote: “Aruna Talent’s agreement has no minimum term, 30 days’ written notice and no exit fee.” | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement is published; the management agreement is provided after the introductory call. The terms of service publish labelled sections on fees and revenue split, term and termination, and intellectual property, and the management page has a table of key contract terms. Quote: “we provide a written management agreement covering scope, fees, and obligations” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Full 10/10 The about page names Aruna Talent LLC and says it is registered in Wyoming, United States. The footer also names Aruna Talent LLC, and the terms are governed by Wyoming law. Quote: “Aruna Talent LLC was founded in 2022 and is registered in Wyoming, United States.” | Full 10/10 The terms of service name Javór GmbH, trading as Foxy Studios, and give Switzerland as the country of registration. Other pages give Baar, Switzerland as headquarters. Quote: “Javór GmbH, trading as Foxy Studios” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2022. The earliest public record of the agency found is the domain registration on 2024-12-11, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Aruna Talent was founded in 2022 after watching talented creators sign with agencies” | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2021. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2023-02-05 (first Wayback capture 2023-04-07), more than 12 months later. The Swiss register entry for the operating company dates from 2025-03-12. Quote: “founded by women in 2021” | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site says the share includes the dedicated team, strategy and full operations (24/7 messaging, content strategy, social media, retention, DMCA monitoring, identity protection). It lists who is not a fit, such as creators wanting fast results without consistent work or not comfortable with adult content. Quote: “You want fast results without consistent execution” | Full 10/10 The fees article lists what the 45% covers (24/7 chatting, content strategy, social media growth, PR, analytics, account protection with DMCA takedowns, burnout support and brand-deal facilitation) and says none of it is charged separately. It states a fit limit of creators already earning $10,000-$15,000 a month or more, and the ranking page says the agency is not built for brand-new creators. Quote: “We work with creators already earning $10,000-$15,000 per month or more” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [Aruna Talent profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) · [Foxy Studios profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/foxy-studios/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: Aruna Talent vs Foxy Studios, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-foxy-studios/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-foxy-studios/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA