# Aruna Talent vs White Door Management: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, Aruna Talent scores 7.1/10 (#6 of 31) and White Door Management scores 9.2/10 (#2) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (6 vs 10 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Aruna Talent) and October 23, 2026 (White Door Management) ## How do Aruna Talent and White Door Management differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: White Door Management publishes more than Aruna Talent on 4: price on the page (C01, in full vs not found), where the money goes (C07, in full vs in part), content rights (C08, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in full vs in part). Aruna Talent publishes no criterion more fully than White Door Management. - Commission: Aruna Talent publishes no rate; White Door Management publishes full account management 25–60% of net. - Notice to end: Aruna Talent: 30 days' written notice; White Door Management: Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving. - Company named on the site: Aruna Talent: Aruna Talent LLC (Wyoming, United States); White Door Management: Kasir Consulting LLC (Wyoming, United States). Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; no commission after you leave; the creator keeps the login; no charges besides the commission; payouts go to the creator; no fixed term that renews itself. ## Aruna Talent and White Door Management key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Not published. The site says its share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee, and that the exact split is laid out on the discovery call. | Full account management 25–60% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | None stated: no upfront cost, no setup fees, no monthly retainer or bill, nothing on top of the share, no exit fee; mentors included, not a paid add-on | None: no upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees; 'The commission is the only charge.' Set-up, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and exit fees are listed as never billed on top. | | Minimum term | None (no minimum term) | None (no minimum term) | | Notice to end | 30 days' written notice | Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving | | Renewal / how the term continues | No automatic renewal | No automatic renewal | | Payments after you leave | None (no commission after the creator leaves) | None ('No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends.') | | Account login | Creator keeps the login; a blog post says the written agreement sets team access through platform-native features with no primary credentials | Account, password, login email and two-step verification stay with the creator; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time (partners page names Infloww as the team's tool). | | Where payouts land | Homepage: OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name. Referral FAQ: payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal. How the agency's share is collected is not stated. | Platform pays directly into the creator's own bank account; the agency never receives or holds payouts and invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. | | Country | United States (LLC registered in Wyoming per the about page) | United States (Wyoming LLC with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: Aruna Talent and White Door Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [Aruna Talent](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) | [White Door Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 7.1/10 | 9.2/10 | | Rank | #6 of 31 | #2 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **6** of 12 in full · 5 partly published, 1 not found | **10** of 12 in full · 2 partly published, 0 not found | | Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes most key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 White Door publishes a commission of 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers its only service, full account management; there is no separate price list per service, and the exact rate is set in the written agreement before signing. Quote: “Rate: 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers the full service” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says the agency's share is calculated on net earnings, after the platform's 20% fee. It does not say which income types (subscriptions, messages/PPV, tips, other) the share applies to. Quote: “Our share is calculated on net, after the platform's 20% fee” | Partial 5/10 The base is stated: net earnings, meaning what reaches the creator after the platform's share, invoiced on the net earnings shown in the platform's own statement for the period. Which income types the commission covers (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) is not stated. Quote: “Net means the earnings that reach the creator after the platform's share” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says there is no upfront cost, no setup fee, no monthly retainer or bill and no exit fee, and that nothing is charged on top of the revenue share; mentors are included rather than a paid add-on. Quote: “We charge nothing upfront and nothing on top” | Full 10/10 The site states that there are no upfront costs, set-up fees or other fees and that the commission is the only charge. It lists set-up fees, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and any exit fee, penalty or commission after the end as never billed on top. Quote: “No upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees. The commission is the only charge.” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ, answering "How long is the contract?", says there is no minimum term, that the partnership continues as long as both sides are winning, and that the creator leaves on 30 days' notice with no exit fee. The guide on its own no-contract approach repeats no minimum term and 30 days' written notice. Quote: “Our partnership continues as long as we’re both winning.” | Full 10/10 No minimum term; either side can end the agreement with thirty days' notice in writing (an email is enough); the site says there is no automatic renewal. Quote: “No minimum term and no automatic lock-in or renewal period.” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Full 10/10 The homepage FAQ says no commission is charged after the creator leaves. Quote: “and there is no commission after you leave” | Full 10/10 The site states that no commission is charged on anything earned after the agreement ends; commission applies only to net earnings up to the end of the agreement. Quote: “No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Full 10/10 The homepage says the creator keeps her login. A blog post says the written agreement covers team access through platform-native features, without the primary credentials. Quote: “team access provisions (platform-native features, no primary credentials)” | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the password, login email and two-step verification; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time. Quote: “Your password, email and two-step verification stay with you. We never ask for the password.” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Partial 5/10 The homepage says OnlyFans pays the creator directly and payouts stay in her name, while the referral FAQ says payouts are processed weekly or bi-weekly by bank transfer or PayPal (E4). How the agency collects its share is not stated. Quote: “You keep your login, OnlyFans pays you directly” | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go directly to the creator's own bank account and the agency never receives or holds them; the agency invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. Quote: “Payouts go from the platform directly to the creator's own bank account.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The terms say creators keep ownership of their original content, and a blog post says the agreement states 100% creator ownership. What happens to the agency's copies and access at the end is not stated. Quote: “Creators retain ownership of their original content.” | Full 10/10 Content belongs to the creator and is used only to run the account, in approved ways, while the agreement runs. At the end the team's access is removed, the voice guide, fan notes and price list are handed back, and the agency's copies are deleted, except records the law requires, such as invoices. Quote: “When the agreement ends, account material is handed back and our copies are deleted” | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. A blog section on the agency's own agreement lists what is agreed in writing: commission base, service scope, 30-day notice, content ownership and team access. Quote: “Aruna Talent’s agreement has no minimum term, 30 days’ written notice and no exit fee.” | Partial 5/10 The site publishes a sample term sheet as a page, with eleven numbered sections (parties, scope, commission, invoicing, term and notice, exit, ownership, confidentiality, content protection, data, individual agreement), readable without a form. It describes itself as a plain-language summary of the standard terms; the individual terms and the full agreement are sent after a first conversation. Quote: “It is a non-binding sample that summarises White Door's standard terms in plain language.” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Full 10/10 The about page names Aruna Talent LLC and says it is registered in Wyoming, United States. The footer also names Aruna Talent LLC, and the terms are governed by Wyoming law. Quote: “Aruna Talent LLC was founded in 2022 and is registered in Wyoming, United States.” | Full 10/10 The site names the operating company, Kasir Consulting LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming, on the company page, the legal notice, the privacy policy, the term sheet and the footer of every page. Quote: “Kasir Consulting LLC, a limited liability company registered in Wyoming, USA” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2022. The earliest public record of the agency found is the domain registration on 2024-12-11, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Aruna Talent was founded in 2022 after watching talented creators sign with agencies” | Full 10/10 The site states that its team has worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026. The earliest record of the agency we found is the registration of its domain, whitedoormgmt.com, on 2026-10-21 (registry RDAP), inside the 12-month window of the stated 2026 start. No web-archive copy exists. The formation date of Kasir Consulting LLC could not be seen (register behind human verification). Quote: “worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026” | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site says the share includes the dedicated team, strategy and full operations (24/7 messaging, content strategy, social media, retention, DMCA monitoring, identity protection). It lists who is not a fit, such as creators wanting fast results without consistent work or not comfortable with adult content. Quote: “You want fast results without consistent execution” | Full 10/10 The site lists what the single commission includes (24/7 inbox in the creator's voice, voice guide, pricing, growth on approved channels, daily note and weekly report, content protection, onboarding, switching and exit help, English and German) and states exclusions and fit limits: no content production, no single services such as leak removal on their own, OnlyFans and Fansly only, and no accounts that would need platform rules bent. Quote: “We manage OnlyFans and Fansly only” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [Aruna Talent profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/aruna-talent/) · [White Door Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/white-door-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: Aruna Talent vs White Door Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-white-door-management/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aruna-talent-vs-white-door-management/ · This page: last checked October 23, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA