<!-- Markdown version of https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/at-agency-vs-lush-management/ -->

# AT Agency vs Lush Management: published terms compared, October 2026

As of October 23, 2026, AT Agency scores 1.7/10 (#28 of 31) and Lush Management scores 1.3/10 (#30) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (0 vs 0 of 12 criteria in full).

Checked October 20–22, 2026 (AT Agency) and October 20, 2026 (Lush Management)

## How do AT Agency and Lush Management differ in published terms?

as of October 23, 2026

- Criteria: AT Agency publishes more than Lush Management on 2: content rights (C08, in part vs not found) and dated history (C11, in part vs not found). Lush Management publishes more than AT Agency on 1: other charges (C03, in part vs not found).

Their key published terms do not differ.

## AT Agency and Lush Management key terms side by side

as published

Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored.

| Term | [AT Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/at-agency/) | [Lush Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lush-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. The only percentage on the site is a 5% referral commission paid to referral partners, not the creator management fee. | Not published. FAQ: 'We only make money, when your account makes money.' The client form on the homepage has an 'OnlyFans Percentage' input field, which is not a stated rate. A blog post says a reputable agency typically charges around 40-50%; this is a general statement, not Lush's own rate. |
| Commission base | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Other charges | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | FAQ: no financial risks, the contract is set up at the agency's cost, no undisclosed costs on the account. Homepage: no payment unless the creator earns. Blog: no upfront payment. Exit fees, ad spend, tool and content costs are not addressed. |
| Minimum term | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not stated; FAQ says a contract is set up after the application phase |
| Notice to end | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Renewal / how the term continues | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Payments after you leave | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Account login | Not stated. Homepage says the team is in the creator's account every day; terms say the agency does not take ownership of the creator's accounts. | Homepage: the creator retains full access to the OnlyFans account. Who holds the password, email and 2FA, and how the team gets access, are not stated. |
| Where payouts land | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Country | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | United Kingdom (homepage FAQ: headquartered in the UK) |

## The 12 criteria side by side

checked October 20–23, 2026

Table: AT Agency and Lush Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026.

| Criterion | [AT Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/at-agency/) | [Lush Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lush-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 1.7/10 | 1.3/10 |
| Rank | #28 of 31 | #30 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | **0** of 12 in full · 4 partly published, 8 not found | **0** of 12 in full · 3 partly published, 9 not found |
| Band | Publishes few key terms | Publishes few key terms |
| [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says there are no financial risks, the contract is set up at the agency's cost, the agency earns only when the account earns, and there are no undisclosed costs on the account. The homepage says no payment unless the creator earns. Exit fees, ad spend, tool and content costs are not covered. Quote: “we set up a contract on our costs” |
| [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Partial 5/10 The terms say the agency does not take ownership of the creator's accounts, and the homepage says the team works in the creator's account every day. The site does not say who holds the password, email and 2FA or how the team gets access. Quote: “We do not take ownership of your content, your accounts, or your brand.” | Partial 5/10 The homepage says the creator keeps full access to the OnlyFans account. It does not say who holds the password, email and 2FA, or how the agency's team gets access. Quote: “You retain full access to your OnlyFans account” |
| [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The terms of service say the creator keeps full ownership of the content they create and that the agency does not take ownership of it. They do not say what happens to the agency's copies and access when the relationship ends. Quote: “You retain full ownership of all content you create.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The about page says the agency was founded in February 2023. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2025-12-16, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Founded in February 2023 by two best friends” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Partial 5/10 The homepage lists the services: content strategy, audience growth, fan management, monetization, brand positioning and content protection. No exclusion or concrete fit limit is stated; the site says it is selective and aims at established creators without giving a threshold. Quote: “The complete infrastructure for OnlyFans promotion, growth, and brand management” | Partial 5/10 The homepage lists what the agency provides: account management (posting and fan messaging), account growth, social media consulting, account strategy and account audits. No exclusion or creator fit limit is stated; the FAQ says it takes both experienced creators and new starters in any niche. Quote: “we handle all content posting and fan messaging” |

Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Full evidence: [AT Agency profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/at-agency/) · [Lush Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lush-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/)

## Cite this page

`OF Agency Rankings: AT Agency vs Lush Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/at-agency-vs-lush-management/. Rubric v1.0.`

Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.

---

Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/

About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/at-agency-vs-lush-management/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA
