# FONCÉ Agency vs SirenCY: published terms compared, October 2026 As of October 23, 2026, FONCÉ Agency and SirenCY both score 5.8/10 on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (#12 and #10 of 31; 3 vs 4 of 12 criteria in full). Checked October 20–22, 2026 (FONCÉ Agency) and October 20, 2026 (SirenCY) ## How do FONCÉ Agency and SirenCY differ in published terms? as of October 23, 2026 - Criteria: SirenCY publishes more than FONCÉ Agency on 2: payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part) and company behind the brand (C10, in full vs not found). FONCÉ Agency publishes more than SirenCY on 3: contract length and notice (C04, in full vs in part), content rights (C08, in part vs not found) and dated history (C11, in part vs not found). - Commission: FONCÉ Agency publishes management 30–50% of net; SirenCY publishes agency fee 35% of net. - No minimum term: SirenCY states it; FONCÉ Agency does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - No commission after you leave: SirenCY states it; FONCÉ Agency does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - The creator keeps the login: SirenCY states it; FONCÉ Agency does not state it in those words (see the key terms below). - Notice to end: FONCÉ Agency: 30 days' prior written notice, either side, at any time; SirenCY: not stated. - Company named on the site: FONCÉ Agency: none stated; SirenCY: QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (Australia). Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; payouts go to the creator. ## FONCÉ Agency and SirenCY key terms side by side as published Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored. | Term | [FONCÉ Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/fonce-agency/) | [SirenCY](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) | |---|---|---| | Commission | Management 30–50% of net | Agency fee 35% of net | | Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) | | Other charges | No statement that commission is the only charge. A worked example refers to 'other separately agreed costs'; in-person filming or meetings in listed cities are by arrangement with costs agreed before booking; a mentorship discovery call costs $10 with further mentorship quoted separately. Setup, retainer, tool, ad and exit fees not addressed. | Models page: no setup charges, nothing charged before the creator earns, and the fee is the only charge. Homepage: any other charges are provided in writing before an agreement. | | Minimum term | One-year initial term that renews for one year at a time; either side may end it at any time with 30 days' prior written notice | None as standard; if a case needs one, it is written into the agreement (models page) | | Notice to end | 30 days' prior written notice, either side, at any time | Not stated (set in each written agreement) | | Renewal / how the term continues | Yes, renews automatically | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | Payments after you leave | Not stated explicitly. The management FAQ says commission is invoiced for the days the agency managed the page. | None: the fee ends when the partnership does; nothing charged on later earnings (models page) | | Account login | Creator retains account access; the agency uses authorized access through Infloww for agreed chatting and posting, with operational access agreed during onboarding. Who holds the password, login email and 2FA is not stated. | Fansly and Fanvue onboarding pages: creator keeps password, two-factor authentication and login details; team works through a Fansly Management Session or Fanvue manager account the creator sets up. OnlyFans access is not described; models FAQ says credential handling is confirmed in the written agreement. | | Where payouts land | OnlyFans payouts go to the creator's linked bank account; the agency invoices its commission on net earnings weekly or every two weeks (PDF invoice; ACH, wire, card or crypto). | Platform pays into the creator's own account and bank; SirenCY then invoices its fee (models page) | | Country | United States (Florida) | Australia (Melbourne) | ## The 12 criteria side by side checked October 20–23, 2026 Table: FONCÉ Agency and SirenCY side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026. | Criterion | [FONCÉ Agency](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/fonce-agency/) | [SirenCY](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) | |---|---|---| | Score | 5.8/10 | 5.8/10 | | Rank | #12 of 31 | #10 of 31 | | Criteria C01–C12 | **3** of 12 in full · 8 partly published, 1 not found | **4** of 12 in full · 6 partly published, 2 not found | | Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes some key terms | | [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Partial 5/10 The site publishes a commission range for direct creator management, but two different ranges appear: 35-50% in the TopAgencies article and 30-50% 'depending on the deal' in several guides (E4). No rate is given per service (OnlyFans management, marketing management, full management); the main management page says the percentage depends on the services in the plan. Quote: “Our management commission ranges from 35–50% of creator earnings after the platform fee.” | Partial 5/10 The site states a single 35% agency fee on the homepage, about, models, contact, apply and terms pages. A self-review blog post on the same site says commission rates are not publicly listed and require a consultation. Quote: “SirenCY charges a 35% agency fee.” | | [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Partial 5/10 The base is stated as the creator's earnings after the platform fee (net), and the payout FAQ says commission is invoiced on net earnings. The site does not say which income types (subscriptions, messages/PPV, tips, other) count, and several guides say the calculation base is agreed in writing for each deal. Quote: “FONCÉ charges an agreed commission on your earnings after the platform fee.” | Partial 5/10 The homepage and models page say the 35% fee is calculated on net earnings, meaning what the platform pays the creator after its own fee. Income types (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) are not listed, and the about page says the calculation base is set in each written agreement. Quote: “It is calculated on your net earnings” | | [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Partial 5/10 The site does not say that the commission is the only charge. It mentions 'other separately agreed costs' in a worked commission example and says in-person filming or meetings in listed cities are arranged with dates, locations and costs agreed before booking, without amounts or who pays. Setup fees, retainers, tool fees, ad spend and exit fees are not addressed. Quote: “Agree dates, locations and costs before booking a session.” | Partial 5/10 The models page says there are no setup charges, nothing is charged before the creator earns, and the fee is the only charge. The homepage says any other charges are provided in writing before an agreement, and a self-review blog post says other charges should be verified in the agreement. Quote: “The fee is the only number here, and it is the only charge.” | | [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Full 10/10 The terms table on the management page says the standard agreement starts with a one-year term that renews for one year at a time. It also says FONCÉ or the creator may end it at any time with 30 days' prior written notice. The Spanish page says the same. Quote: “starts with a one-year term and renews for one year at a time” | Partial 5/10 The models page says there is no minimum term as standard and any minimum is written into the agreement. The notice period and automatic renewal are not stated; the about page says the agreement sets how long it runs and the notice either side gives. Quote: “None as standard. If your case needs one, it is written in your agreement” | | [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Partial 5/10 The payout FAQ says the agency invoices its commission for the days it managed the creator's page. The site has no explicit statement on whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: “weekly or every two weeks for the days it managed your page” | Full 10/10 The models page says the fee ends when the partnership ends and nothing is charged on what the creator earns afterwards. Quote: “The fee ends when the partnership does. Nothing is charged on what you earn afterwards.” | | [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Partial 5/10 The site says the team works through authorized access in Infloww for agreed chatting and posting, with operational access agreed during onboarding, and that the creator keeps account access. It does not say who holds the account password, login email and 2FA. Quote: “FONCÉ uses authorized access through Infloww for agreed account operations, including chatting and posting.” | Partial 5/10 For Fansly and Fanvue, the site's onboarding steps say the creator keeps the password, two-factor authentication and login details, and the team works through a Fansly Management Session or Fanvue manager account the creator sets up. For OnlyFans, the main offer, credentials and team access are not described; the models page FAQ says these are confirmed in the written agreement. Quote: “You create the Management Sessions, keep your password and two-factor authentication” | | [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go to the creator's own linked bank account, and the creator chooses when to withdraw. The agency invoices its commission on net earnings weekly or every two weeks, sends a PDF invoice, and accepts ACH, wire, card or crypto. Quote: “Your OnlyFans payouts go directly to your linked bank account” | Full 10/10 The models page says platform payouts go into the creator's own account and bank, and SirenCY then invoices its fee. Quote: “The platform pays into your own account and bank; SirenCY then invoices its fee.” | | [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Partial 5/10 The site says the creator keeps ownership of their content and creative ownership. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies of content or its access when the engagement ends. Quote: “You retain access to your accounts and ownership of your content.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Partial 5/10 The management page has a labelled table, introduced as a partial summary of the agency's standard management terms: commission, standalone add-ons, the plan, payouts, invoices, account access, and term and notice. The full agreement is not published; the site says to read it before signing. The Spanish page has the same table. Quote: “This is a partial summary of our standard management terms.” | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement or full term sheet is published. The models page has a labelled table of standard terms: fee, calculation basis, payout route, setup charges, post-exit fee and minimum term. Quote: “The terms below are the standard ones; your agreement is the final word.” | | [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 The terms of service name QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (ABN 28 667 365 479), trading as SirenCY and under the registered business name X SIREN MEDIA. The about page says it is an Australian private company; the terms are governed by Victorian law. Quote: “operated by QOSMIC CO PTY LTD (ABN 28 667 365 479), trading as SirenCY” | | [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The about page says the agency was founded in 2020. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2023-07-24 (first Wayback capture 2023-08-10), more than 12 months after the stated start. Quote: “Founded in 2020, FONCÉ connects creator strategy with day-to-day management, marketing, and protection.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | | [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Full 10/10 The site lists what each plan can include (page operations with 24/7 fan-message coverage, daily posting, profile optimization and a weekly content planner; marketing management; full management adding DMCA takedown coordination). It states fit limits: creators must be 18 or older, commit to at least 14 Reels a week and reply to the team within 24 hours, and the creator makes the content. Quote: “The weekly plan calls for at least 14 Reels (short videos)” | Full 10/10 The homepage says SirenCY provides content planning, fan chatting workflows, monetization strategy and operations, with exact scope set per creator, and lists who is probably not a fit, such as creators wanting overnight results without collaboration. Quote: “Creators looking for overnight results without collaboration.” | Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Full evidence: [FONCÉ Agency profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/fonce-agency/) · [SirenCY profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/sirency/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/) ## Cite this page `OF Agency Rankings: FONCÉ Agency vs SirenCY, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/fonce-agency-vs-sirency/. Rubric v1.0.` Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. --- Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/ About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/fonce-agency-vs-sirency/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA