<!-- Markdown version of https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/lounas-models-vs-melossom-management/ -->

# Louna's Models vs Melossom Management: published terms compared, October 2026

As of October 23, 2026, Louna's Models and Melossom Management both score 3.3/10 on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (#20 and #19 of 31; 1 vs 2 of 12 criteria in full).

Checked October 20–22, 2026 (Louna's Models) and October 20, 2026 (Melossom Management)

## How do Louna's Models and Melossom Management differ in published terms?

as of October 23, 2026

- Criteria: Melossom Management publishes more than Louna's Models on 3: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in part vs not found), where the money goes (C07, in full vs not found) and company behind the brand (C10, in full vs not found). Louna's Models publishes more than Melossom Management on 5: contract length and notice (C04, in part vs not found), payments after you leave (C05, in part vs not found), account access (C06, in part vs not found), content rights (C08, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in part vs not found).
- Commission base: Louna's Models does not state it; Melossom Management takes it from net earnings.
- Payouts go to the creator: Melossom Management states it; Louna's Models does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Company named on the site: Louna's Models: none stated; Melossom Management: Aureus Management Ltd (England and Wales, United Kingdom).

## Louna's Models and Melossom Management key terms side by side

as published

Table: Key terms as each site states them. Facts are shown, not scored.

| Term | [Louna's Models](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lounas-models/) | [Melossom Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/melossom-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. English FAQ: commission is 'competitive and performance-based'; Spanish FAQ: the exact percentage is agreed individually in the initial interview; the agency's own ranking lists its revenue share as 'quoted per creator'. Several city blog posts describe a 'no-commission model' or '0% commission' in connection with the Exclu tool. | Percentage not published. FAQ: a weekly performance fee based on a percentage of the creator's net earnings for that week, invoiced weekly. |
| Commission base | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Net (after the platform fee) |
| Other charges | No upfront fees, no setup costs (English FAQ); Spanish FAQ adds no monthly fee, no onboarding fee, works exclusively on commission with no fixed cost, no penalties to leave. A Miami blog post says the agency 'may offer 0% during onboarding or use fixed-fee models'. | FAQ: the service is free with no upfront cost; only the weekly performance fee is charged. Exit fees, ad spend, tool and content costs are not addressed. |
| Minimum term | No long-term contracts (no term stated) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Notice to end | Not stated (leave at any time) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Renewal / how the term continues | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Payments after you leave | Not stated; account remains the creator's and the agency removes its team's access | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Account login | Creator retains full ownership and control of the OnlyFans account; the agency's team has access that is removed when the creator leaves. Credential holding and access method not described. | Not stated for OnlyFans. The privacy policy says the agency never receives the Instagram password for its separate Instagram analytics tool. |
| Where payouts land | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | FAQ: all OnlyFans payouts go directly to the creator; the agency invoices its performance fee weekly |
| Country | United States (contact address in Newark, Delaware; site says the agency was founded in Los Angeles) | United Kingdom (registered in England and Wales; registered office in Newport) |

## The 12 criteria side by side

checked October 20–23, 2026

Table: Louna's Models and Melossom Management side by side: score, 12 criteria and key terms as published, checked October 20–23, 2026.

| Criterion | [Louna's Models](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lounas-models/) | [Melossom Management](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/melossom-management/) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.3/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Rank | #20 of 31 | #19 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | **1** of 12 in full · 6 partly published, 5 not found | **2** of 12 in full · 4 partly published, 6 not found |
| Band | Publishes few key terms | Publishes few key terms |
| [Price on the page](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/price-on-the-page/) (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [What the percentage is taken from](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/commission-base/) (C02) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the fee is a percentage of the creator's net earnings for the week. It does not say which income types (subscriptions, messages, tips) count. Quote: “a weekly performance fee based on a percentage of your NET earnings” |
| [Other charges](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/other-charges/) (C03) | Partial 5/10 The Spanish FAQ says the agency works only on commission with no fixed cost, no upfront payment, no monthly fee and no onboarding fee; the English FAQ says no upfront fees and no setup costs. A blog post says the agency may use fixed-fee models, which conflicts (E4). Quote: “Trabajamos exclusivamente a comisión, sin ningún coste fijo.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says there is no upfront cost and that the agency charges a weekly performance fee. It does not address exit fees, ad spend, tool fees or content costs. Quote: “Our service is FREE with no upfront cost” |
| [Contract length and notice](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/term-and-notice/) (C04) | Partial 5/10 The site says there are no long-term contracts and that creators can leave at any time. It gives no minimum term, no notice period and does not say whether the contract renews automatically. Quote: “There are no upfront fees, no setup costs, and no long-term contracts.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Payments after you leave](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/after-you-leave/) (C05) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ describes what happens on exit (the account stays the creator's and the agency removes its access), but does not say whether any commission continues on income earned after the contract ends. Quote: “If you ever decide to part ways with Louna’s Models, your account remains entirely yours.” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Account access](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/account-access/) (C06) | Partial 5/10 The site says the creator keeps full ownership and control of the account and that the agency removes its team's access on exit. It does not say who holds the password, email and 2FA or how the team gets access. Quote: “You retain full ownership and control of your OnlyFans account, content, and subscribers” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Where the money goes](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/money-flow/) (C07) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 The FAQ says all OnlyFans payouts go directly to the creator and that the agency invoices its performance fee weekly. Quote: “All payouts from OnlyFans will go directly to you” |
| [Content rights](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/content-rights/) (C08) | Full 10/10 The FAQ says the creator keeps full ownership and control of the account, content and subscribers at all times, and that when the creator leaves the agency removes its team's access. Quote: “We simply remove our team’s access — nothing changes for your fans.” | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the creator keeps full ownership of content and that the agency uses it on the creator's behalf only when an agreement is in place. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies and access at the end. Quote: “No, you keep full ownership of your content” |
| [Contract text before signing](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/contract-before-signing/) (C09) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Company behind the brand](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/company-behind-the-brand/) (C10) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Full 10/10 The footer, terms and privacy policy name Aureus Management Ltd, trading as Melossom, registered in England and Wales with a registered office in Newport. Quote: “Aureus Management Ltd \| All Rights Reserved. Registered in England and Wales.” |
| [Dated history](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/dated-history/) (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site states the agency was founded in 2018. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 9 November 2022, more than 12 months later. Quote: “Founded in Los Angeles in 2018,” | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| [Scope and fit](https://ofagencyrankings.com/criteria/scope-and-fit/) (C12) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ lists what management includes (24/7 chat management, pricing and PPV optimisation, multi-platform marketing, scheduling, analytics, DMCA protection). No exclusions or creator limits are stated; the site says it takes beginners and established creators. Quote: “this includes professional fan messaging and chat management 24/7” | Partial 5/10 The homepage lists what the agency provides: social media strategy, social media account optimisation, OnlyFans account management, 24/7 messaging and DMCA content protection. No exclusion or creator fit limit is stated. Quote: “providing a multitude of services including” |

Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Full evidence: [Louna's Models profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/lounas-models/) · [Melossom Management profile](https://ofagencyrankings.com/agencies/melossom-management/) · [All comparisons](https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/) · [All commission rates](https://ofagencyrankings.com/commission/)

## Cite this page

`OF Agency Rankings: Louna's Models vs Melossom Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/lounas-models-vs-melossom-management/. Rubric v1.0.`

Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.

---

Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria. How we handle this: https://ofagencyrankings.com/disclosure/

About the scores: measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.

Source page: https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/lounas-models-vs-melossom-management/ · This page: last checked October 22, 2026 · Data checked October 20–23, 2026 · Rubric v1.0 · Data licence CC BY 4.0 · Publisher: Fan Fusion LLC, Wyoming, USA