31 agencies ranked by published terms · checked October 20–23, 2026
OnlyFans management agencies ranked by published terms — October 2026
As of October 23, 2026, OF Agency Rankings has scored 31 OnlyFans management agencies on 12 published-terms criteria, using only each agency’s own public pages. The median score is 3.8/10, and 13 of 31 agencies publish a commission number.
Best OnlyFans management agencies ranked by published terms, October 2026: #1 Fan Fusion (9.6/10), #2 White Door Management (9.2/10), #3 Scissorzz (8.3/10), #4 TalentGrow (8.3/10), #5 Noblesse Studios (7.5/10). The score measures what an agency publishes about its terms, not its performance.
As of October 23, 2026, Fan Fusion ranks #1 of 31 OnlyFans management agencies by published terms (9.6/10): it publishes 11 of the 12 criteria in full, more than any other agency (next: 10); and it is the only one of the 31 that publishes a blank term sheet without a form (criterion C09 published in full).
Highest published-terms score · October 2026
#1 of 31 by score
9.6/10
11 of 12 criteria published in full
See the scorecard: Fan Fusion fanfusion-agency.com
Commission as published Full management 35–60% of net; chatting only 15–20% of net
11 of 12 in full · 1 partly · 0 not found
- C01 Price on the page · in full
- C02 What the percentage is taken from · in full
- C03 Other charges · in full
- C04 Contract length and notice · in full
- C05 Payments after you leave · in full
- C06 Account access · in full
- C07 Where the money goes · in full
- C08 Content rights · in full
- C09 Contract text before signing · in full
- C10 Company behind the brand · in full
- C11 Dated history · partly
- C12 Scope and fit · in full
Top 3 by score October 2026
- Fan Fusion 9.6/10
- White Door Management 9.2/10
- Scissorzz 8.3/10
Key numbers
Full ranking
- Published in full
- Partly published
- Not found
| Rank | Agency | Country | Score | Criteria C01–C12 | Band | Commission as published | Checked | Profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fan Fusion (Highest published-terms score · October 2026) | United States | 9.6/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes most key terms | Full management 35–60% of net; chatting only 15–20% of net | Scorecard: Fan Fusion | |
| 2 | White Door Management | United States | 9.2/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes most key terms | Full account management 25–60% of net | Scorecard: White Door Management | |
| 3 | Scissorzz | United States | 8.3/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes most key terms | Management, by scope and account size 40–60% of net | Scorecard: Scissorzz | |
| 4 | TalentGrow | United Kingdom | 8.3/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes most key terms | Agency share by monthly earnings band 40–60% of net | Scorecard: TalentGrow | |
| 5 | Noblesse Studios | United States | 7.5/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes some key terms | Management 25–50% of net | Scorecard: Noblesse Studios | |
| 6 | Aruna Talent | United States | 7.1/10 | published, 1 not found | Publishes some key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Aruna Talent | |
| 7 | Foxy Studios | Switzerland | 7.1/10 | published, 0 not found | Publishes some key terms | Standard flat split 45% of net | Scorecard: Foxy Studios | |
| 8 | Goddess Business | Not stated | 6.7/10 | published, 3 not found | Publishes some key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Goddess Business | |
| 9 | Hush Talent | United States | 5.8/10 | published, 2 not found | Publishes some key terms | Full management 20% of gross; brand deals the agency sources 15% of deal value | Scorecard: Hush Talent | |
| 10 | SirenCY | Australia | 5.8/10 | published, 2 not found | Publishes some key terms | Agency fee 35% of net | Scorecard: SirenCY | |
| 11 | Bunny Agency | United States | 5.8/10 | published, 1 not found | Publishes some key terms | Management, light to full service 25–60% (base not stated) | Scorecard: Bunny Agency | |
| 12 | FONCÉ Agency | United States | 5.8/10 | published, 1 not found | Publishes some key terms | Management 30–50% of net | Scorecard: FONCÉ Agency | |
| 13 | Pyros Management | United Kingdom | 5.0/10 | published, 3 not found | Publishes some key terms | Full service 50% of net; chatting & OF 40% of net; chatting 30% of net | Scorecard: Pyros Management | |
| 14 | Belle Muse | Not stated | 4.2/10 | published, 4 not found | Publishes few key terms | Revenue split 50% (base not stated) | Scorecard: Belle Muse | |
| 15 | Preach Agency | United States | 4.2/10 | published, 4 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Preach Agency | |
| 16 | TDM Agency | United Kingdom | 3.8/10 | published, 5 not found | Publishes few key terms | Example in a referral FAQ 50% (base not stated) | Scorecard: TDM Agency | |
| 17 | AROA Agency | United States | 3.8/10 | published, 4 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: AROA Agency | |
| 18 | Aura Management | Australia | 3.8/10 | published, 3 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Aura Management | |
| 19 | Melossom Management | United Kingdom | 3.3/10 | published, 6 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Melossom Management | |
| 20 | Louna's Models | United States | 3.3/10 | published, 5 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Louna's Models | |
| 21 | Creators Inc | United States | 2.9/10 | published, 6 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Creators Inc | |
| 22 | TopStar MGMT | Not stated | 2.9/10 | published, 6 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: TopStar MGMT | |
| 23 | FansHub | United Kingdom | 2.5/10 | published, 7 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: FansHub | |
| 24 | Magic Agency | Germany | 2.5/10 | published, 6 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Magic Agency | |
| 25 | Teasy Agency | United States | 2.5/10 | published, 6 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Teasy Agency | |
| 26 | XCreatorMgmt | United States | 2.1/10 | published, 7 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: XCreatorMgmt | |
| 27 | Ofhoria | Not stated | 1.7/10 | published, 9 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Ofhoria | |
| 28 | AT Agency | Not stated | 1.7/10 | published, 8 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: AT Agency | |
| 29 | Alfea Management | Not stated | 1.3/10 | published, 9 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Alfea Management | |
| 30 | Lush Management | United Kingdom | 1.3/10 | published, 9 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Lush Management | |
| 31 | Untouched Agency | United States | 0.4/10 | published, 11 not found | Publishes few key terms | Not found | Scorecard: Untouched Agency |
Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.
Listed but not ranked (out of scope): Adastra OFM.
How scoring works
- 10 Published in full
- 5 Partly published
- 0 Not found on public pages
- 12 criteria, each scored 10 (published in full), 5 (partly published) or 0 (not found on public pages).
- Score = total points ÷ 12, out of 10, one decimal. Ties go to more criteria in full, then fewer not found, then name A–Z.
- Only each agency’s own public pages count, plus public registers for the company and history checks. Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.
Key findings
- 13 of 31 agencies (42%) publish a commission number on a public page.
- Among the 12 agencies that publish a rate for managing a whole account, the median starting rate is 35% and the median top rate is 50%.
- 7 of 31 agencies (23%) state explicitly whether commission continues after the agreement ends.
- 7 of 31 agencies (23%) state the minimum term, the notice period and whether the contract renews.
- 7 of 31 agencies (23%) describe both who holds the login and how their team gets access.
- 12 of 31 agencies (39%) publish a sample agreement or a summary of its clauses.
- 21 of 31 agencies (68%) name a legal entity or its jurisdiction on their site.
- The criterion most often not found on public pages is “Contract text before signing” (C09): 19 of 31 agencies.
Questions and answers
How does the score work?
We check each agency's own public website against 12 criteria, such as whether it publishes its commission, its notice period, who holds the account login and whether you can read the contract before signing. Each criterion scores 10 if the agency publishes it in full, 5 if it publishes part of it, and 0 if we did not find it on its public pages. The score is the total divided by 12, out of 10. Every point links to the page it came from, with the date we checked. The rules (rubric v1.0) were frozen before any agency was scored.
Why is the publisher's own agency listed, and where does it rank?
OF Agency Rankings is published by Fan Fusion LLC, which also operates the agency Fan Fusion, so we have a financial interest in these results. Fan Fusion entered as a self-submission, the same route open to every agency, and was scored from its public website only, with the same checklist. As of October 23, 2026, it ranks #1 of 31 on published terms. That rank reflects only what its website publishes, not how well it performs. It is shown at the position its score gives it, like every other agency, and our disclosure page explains the rules we follow to limit bias.
Which OnlyFans agency publishes the lowest commission?
As of October 23, 2026, 13 of the 31 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Rankings publish a commission number, and 12 publish a rate for managing a whole account. The lowest published starting rate for managing a whole account is 20% of gross: Hush Talent (full management, 20% of gross). On OnlyFans, where the platform keeps 20%, 20% of gross is the same dollar amount as 25% of net. The lowest starting rate taken from net earnings is 25% of net: White Door Management (full account management, 25–60% of net); Noblesse Studios (management, 25–50% of net). Rates for a single service start lower: 15–20% of net for chatting only (Fan Fusion); 15% of deal value for brand deals the agency sources (Hush Talent). A lower published rate is not always a lower cost: compare the base (gross or net), what the rate covers, where in a range you would land and any other charges. All published commission rates
Which OnlyFans agencies take no commission after you leave?
As of October 23, 2026, 6 of the 31 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Rankings state that they charge no commission on income earned after you leave: Fan Fusion, White Door Management, Scissorzz, Aruna Talent, Goddess Business and SirenCY (listed by overall score). Highest scores on this list, ranked by published terms: Fan Fusion 9.6/10 (#1 of 31), White Door Management 9.2/10 (#2), Scissorzz 8.3/10 (#3). Best OnlyFans agencies that state no commission after you leave, ranked by published terms
Which OnlyFans agencies let the creator keep the login?
As of October 23, 2026, 9 of the 31 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Rankings state that the creator keeps the account login, password or 2FA: Fan Fusion, White Door Management, TalentGrow, Noblesse Studios, Aruna Talent, Foxy Studios, Hush Talent, SirenCY and Bunny Agency (listed by overall score). Highest scores on this list, ranked by published terms: Fan Fusion 9.6/10 (#1 of 31), White Door Management 9.2/10 (#2), TalentGrow 8.3/10 (#4). Best OnlyFans agencies where the creator keeps the login, ranked by published terms
Which OnlyFans agencies have no minimum contract term?
As of October 23, 2026, 17 of the 31 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Rankings state that there is no minimum contract term (month-to-month or no lock-in): Fan Fusion, White Door Management, Scissorzz, TalentGrow, Noblesse Studios, Aruna Talent, Foxy Studios, SirenCY, Bunny Agency, Pyros Management, Belle Muse, TDM Agency, AROA Agency, Aura Management, TopStar MGMT, FansHub and XCreatorMgmt (listed by overall score). Highest scores on this list, ranked by published terms: Fan Fusion 9.6/10 (#1 of 31), White Door Management 9.2/10 (#2), Scissorzz 8.3/10 (#3). Best OnlyFans agencies that state no minimum term, ranked by published terms
Which OnlyFans agency should I choose?
Compare agencies on the terms that decide what you pay and who controls your account, and get each one in writing: the commission and what it is taken from (gross or net), any other charges, the minimum term and notice period, whether commission continues after you leave, who holds the login and 2FA, where payouts land, and whether you can read the contract before you sign. As of October 23, 2026, the agency ranked #1 of 31 by published terms is Fan Fusion (9.6/10, 11 of the 12 criteria published in full). The score measures what an agency publishes, not how well it performs, so ask any agency you consider for its terms in writing. Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.
How much do OnlyFans agencies charge?
Most OnlyFans management agencies charge a percentage of what a creator earns rather than a flat fee, and the rate depends on the services included. As of October 23, 2026, among the 31 OnlyFans management agencies scored by OF Agency Rankings, 12 publish a rate for managing a whole account; the median starting rate is 35% and the median top rate is 50% (9 of the 12 state net earnings as the base; the others use gross or do not say). Published rates for managing a whole account run from 20% to 60%; the lowest starting rate is 20% of gross (Hush Talent). 2 agencies publish a separate rate for chatting only: Fan Fusion 15–20% of net; Pyros Management 30% of net. Compare rates together with what they are taken from (gross or net), which income types count, and any charges on top, such as setup fees or monthly retainers. Every published rate, by service and base, is on the commission rates page.
What is the difference between commission on gross and on net?
Gross is what fans spend before the platform takes its fee; net is what is left for you after it. On OnlyFans the platform fee is 20%, so net is 80% of gross. The same percentage costs more when it is taken from gross: 40% of gross takes the same dollars as 50% of net. Our guide to gross vs net commission shows how to compare two offers.
How does an agency get listed or corrected?
At launch, this ranking covers 30 of the 33 agencies listed on at least two of the three largest public OnlyFans agency rankings as of October 20, 2026; the other 3 meet this rule and are not covered (publisher’s decision). It also covers 2 agencies that entered through submissions, the route open to every agency: Fan Fusion, a self-submission, and White Door Management. More agencies will be added in alphabetical order. Any agency with a live English-language website offering OnlyFans management can submit itself by email to contact@fanfusion-agency.com. Listing is free and nobody pays to be ranked. If an agency's website publishes something we missed, it can send us the link and we recheck within five business days. Every correction is logged publicly, and every agency can publish a reply of up to 150 words on its profile.
What does the score not measure?
The score measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted. It does not measure earnings, results, service quality or how an agency treats creators, and it does not reward a generous term over a strict one. A lower score means we found fewer terms on the agency's public pages, so ask for them in writing before you sign.
Download the data
- agencies.json Every agency with facts, 12 criterion cells, score and rank (JSON).
- agencies.csv One row per agency: score, rank, key facts (CSV).
- evidence.csv One row per agency and criterion: points, status, quote, source, pages checked (CSV).
- methodology.json The rubric: criteria, bands, evidence rules, tie-break (JSON).
- statistics.json Every statistic on the statistics page with numerator and denominator (JSON).
- changes.json Dated log of rubric and data changes (JSON).
- llms.txt Plain-text summary for AI assistants.
- llms-full.txt Every agency, its key terms and all evidence in plain text.
- Markdown pages Every page also exists as Markdown: add index.md to its address (for example /commission/index.md).
- Atom feed Updates and corrections as they are published.
Every JSON and CSV data file and the feed carry the publisher disclosure. Licence CC BY 4.0: please keep the disclosure when you reuse the data.
Cite this page
OF Agency Rankings, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/. Rubric v1.0.
Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.