Aura Management vs Louna's Models: published terms compared, October 2026
As of October 23, 2026, Aura Management scores 3.8/10 (#18 of 31) and Louna's Models scores 3.3/10 (#20) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (0 vs 1 of 12 criteria in full).
How do Aura Management and Louna's Models differ in published terms?
- Criteria: Aura Management publishes more than Louna's Models on 3: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in part vs not found), where the money goes (C07, in part vs not found) and company behind the brand (C10, in part vs not found). Louna's Models publishes more than Aura Management on 2: content rights (C08, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in part vs not found).
- Commission base: Aura Management takes it from net earnings; Louna's Models does not state it.
- No minimum term: Aura Management states it; Louna's Models does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Payouts go to the creator: Aura Management states it; Louna's Models does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Company named on the site: Aura Management: GWB Pty Ltd (Australia); Louna's Models: none stated.
Aura Management and Louna's Models key terms side by side
| Term | Aura Management | Louna's Models |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Not published. FAQ says commission is agreed after the initial consultation and depends on social media presence and account size; a blog post says the agency receives a percentage of net earnings. | Not published. English FAQ: commission is 'competitive and performance-based'; Spanish FAQ: the exact percentage is agreed individually in the initial interview; the agency's own ranking lists its revenue share as 'quoted per creator'. Several city blog posts describe a 'no-commission model' or '0% commission' in connection with the Exclu tool. |
| Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Other charges | FAQ says contracts do not contain 'nasty clauses about fees'; no list of fees or amounts. 'Professional Invoicing' and 'OnlyFans Accounting' are listed as features without saying whether they cost extra. | No upfront fees, no setup costs (English FAQ); Spanish FAQ adds no monthly fee, no onboarding fee, works exclusively on commission with no fixed cost, no penalties to leave. A Miami blog post says the agency 'may offer 0% during onboarding or use fixed-fee models'. |
| Minimum term | None stated as a lock-in: FAQ says creators are not locked in and can cancel the agreement any time | No long-term contracts (no term stated) |
| Notice to end | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not stated (leave at any time) |
| Renewal / how the term continues | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Payments after you leave | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not stated; account remains the creator's and the agency removes its team's access |
| Account login | Not stated who holds credentials. How-we-work page says client data and content are accessed only by the assigned account manager, who takes over daily account management. | Creator retains full ownership and control of the OnlyFans account; the agency's team has access that is removed when the creator leaves. Credential holding and access method not described. |
| Where payouts land | FAQ: weekly payouts from the creator's account directly into the creator's nominated bank account. Commission collection method not stated. | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Country | Australia (homepage: 'Australian Registered and Owned Company'; website terms governed by New South Wales law) | United States (contact address in Newark, Delaware; site says the agency was founded in Los Angeles) |
The 12 criteria side by side
| Criterion | Aura Management | Louna's Models |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.8/10 | 3.3/10 |
| Rank | #18 of 31 | #20 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | published, 3 not found | published, 5 not found |
| Band | Publishes few key terms | Publishes few key terms |
| Price on the page (C01) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| What the percentage is taken from (C02) | Partial 5/10 A blog post on the agency's site says its commission is a percentage of net earnings. The income types the percentage applies to are not stated. Quote: | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Other charges (C03) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the agency's contracts contain no 'nasty' fee clauses. It does not list which charges besides the commission exist or are excluded (setup, retainers, tools, ad spend, content costs, exit fees). Quote: | Partial 5/10 The Spanish FAQ says the agency works only on commission with no fixed cost, no upfront payment, no monthly fee and no onboarding fee; the English FAQ says no upfront fees and no setup costs. A blog post says the agency may use fixed-fee models, which conflicts (E4). Quote: |
| Contract length and notice (C04) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says creators are not locked in and can cancel the agreement at any time. No notice period is given and automatic renewal is not addressed. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The site says there are no long-term contracts and that creators can leave at any time. It gives no minimum term, no notice period and does not say whether the contract renews automatically. Quote: |
| Payments after you leave (C05) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says a creator can cancel the agreement at any time. It does not say whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The FAQ describes what happens on exit (the account stays the creator's and the agency removes its access), but does not say whether any commission continues on income earned after the contract ends. Quote: |
| Account access (C06) | Partial 5/10 The how-we-work page says a dedicated manager takes over daily management of the account and that only the assigned account manager accesses client data and content. It does not say who holds the password, account email and 2FA. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The site says the creator keeps full ownership and control of the account and that the agency removes its team's access on exit. It does not say who holds the password, email and 2FA or how the team gets access. Quote: |
| Where the money goes (C07) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says payouts from the creator's account go weekly into the creator's nominated bank account, and that the agency carries out the payout. It does not say how the agency's commission is collected. Quote: | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Content rights (C08) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ says the creator keeps ownership of their content before and after working with Aura. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies and access when the engagement ends. Quote: | Full 10/10 The FAQ says the creator keeps full ownership and control of the account, content and subscribers at all times, and that when the creator leaves the agency removes its team's access. Quote: |
| Contract text before signing (C09) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Company behind the brand (C10) | Partial 5/10 The terms page names GWB Pty Ltd trading as Aura Management, with ABN 94 661 065 989 and ACN 661 065 989, and the homepage says it is an Australian registered company. The footer on every page names a different entity, 'Aura Management Pty Ltd', so the two statements conflict (E4). Quote: | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Dated history (C11) | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) | Partial 5/10 The site states the agency was founded in 2018. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 9 November 2022, more than 12 months later. Quote: |
| Scope and fit (C12) | Partial 5/10 The FAQ lists the services: daily account management, content scheduling and guidance, posting, DM management, monetisation, monthly audits and marketing. No exclusion or creator-fit limit is stated; the FAQ says newcomers are welcome and services are not limited to erotic content. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The FAQ lists what management includes (24/7 chat management, pricing and PPV optimisation, multi-platform marketing, scheduling, analytics, DMCA protection). No exclusions or creator limits are stated; the site says it takes beginners and established creators. Quote: |
Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.
Full evidence: Aura Management profile · Louna's Models profile · All comparisons · All commission rates
Cite this page
OF Agency Rankings: Aura Management vs Louna's Models, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/aura-management-vs-lounas-models/. Rubric v1.0.
Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.