Foxy Studios vs Hush Talent: published terms compared, October 2026
As of October 23, 2026, Foxy Studios scores 7.1/10 (#7 of 31) and Hush Talent scores 5.8/10 (#9) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (5 vs 4 of 12 criteria in full).
How do Foxy Studios and Hush Talent differ in published terms?
- Criteria: Foxy Studios publishes more than Hush Talent on 4: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part), where the money goes (C07, in part vs not found), content rights (C08, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in part vs not found). Hush Talent publishes more than Foxy Studios on 1: payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part).
- Commission: Foxy Studios publishes standard flat split 45% of net; Hush Talent publishes full management 20% of gross, brand deals the agency sources 15% of deal value.
- Commission base: Foxy Studios takes it from net earnings; Hush Talent takes it from gross revenue.
- No minimum term: Foxy Studios states it; Hush Talent does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- No charges besides the commission: Foxy Studios states it; Hush Talent does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Notice to end: Foxy Studios: Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide); Hush Talent: 30 days' notice after the initial 90-day term (month to month).
- Company named on the site: Foxy Studios: Javór GmbH (Switzerland); Hush Talent: Hush Talent Inc (California, United States).
Where they publish the same: the creator keeps the login.
Foxy Studios and Hush Talent key terms side by side
| Term | Foxy Studios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Standard flat split 45% of net | Full management 20% of gross; brand deals the agency sources 15% of deal value |
| Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Gross (fan spend before the platform fee) |
| Other charges | None stated: terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split; fees article says no setup fees, retainers, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission; homepage says no penalties for leaving. | No application fee, onboarding/setup fee, monthly retainer, minimum or cancellation penalty; in-house production included. Optional consulting products are sold separately ($24-$149). |
| Minimum term | None (month-to-month, no lock-in) | 90-day initial term |
| Notice to end | Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide) | 30 days' notice after the initial 90-day term (month to month) |
| Renewal / how the term continues | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | Conflicting: pricing says it continues month to month after the 90-day term; homepage FAQ says 90 days with mutual renewal |
| Payments after you leave | Not stated. Terms say account credentials, content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. | Terms of service: compensation is earned exclusively through commission on revenue generated during the management engagement. |
| Account login | Pages differ: the ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts, content and logins; the terms say the agency hands back account credentials in its possession within 14 days of termination. How the team accesses accounts is not described. | Agency states it never asks for platform logins and that the creator keeps control of the accounts; how the team carries out publishing and fan messaging without logins is not described. |
| Where payouts land | Contact FAQ: the agency handles all processing and the creator receives a 55% share weekly; the fees article describes monthly reconciliation against OnlyFans payout statements. The account where platform payouts land is not named. | Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Country | Switzerland (headquarters stated as Baar) | United States (incorporated in California; offices stated in Greenwich CT, New York NY and Los Angeles CA) |
The 12 criteria side by side
| Criterion | Foxy Studios | Hush Talent |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.1/10 | 5.8/10 |
| Rank | #7 of 31 | #9 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | published, 0 not found | published, 2 not found |
| Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes some key terms |
| Price on the page (C01) | Partial 5/10 The standard rate is published: the agency takes 45% and the creator keeps 55%. An elite tier with improved splits for creators earning $50,000+/month is offered without a figure, and the fees article describes unpriced bespoke terms at about $150,000+/month. The same FAQ says 55/45 is the only split and applies to every creator (E4). Quote: | Partial 5/10 The pricing page publishes 20% for full management and 15% of deal value for brand deals the agency sources, and says these are the only two rates. The homepage says exact rates are finalized on the strategy call based on income, content type and services, so the two pages conflict (E4). Quote: |
| What the percentage is taken from (C02) | Full 10/10 The fees article says the 45% is taken from post-OnlyFans revenue (what remains after the platform's 20%), gives worked examples on the whole post-platform amount, and says PPV is included at the standard split with no separate PPV commission. Chargebacks come out of gross before the split. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The base is stated as gross; the agency's own commission article explains gross as before the OnlyFans 20% cut and says the agency charges on gross. The site does not list which income types (subscriptions, messages/PPV, tips, other) count toward managed revenue. Quote: |
| Other charges (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says the split is the whole pricing model: the terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split, and the fees article says there are no setup fees, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission and that everything listed is covered by the 45%. The homepage says there are no penalties for leaving. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site says the two commission rates are the only rates and that there is no application, onboarding or setup fee, no monthly retainer, no minimum and no cancellation penalty. Studio time and production are included rather than billed. Quote: |
| Contract length and notice (C04) | Partial 5/10 The terms say Foxy works on a month-to-month basis, so the agreement continues each month until notice is given. They also say there is no long-term lock-in and either party may end the agreement with 30 days' written notice, and the homepage FAQ repeats the 30 days. A guide for European creators instead gives 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days. The notice periods therefore differ between pages (E4). Quote: | Partial 5/10 The pricing page states a 90-day initial term that then continues month to month with 30 days' notice. The homepage FAQ describes the standard contract as 90 days 'with mutual renewal', which conflicts with automatic month-to-month continuation (E4). Quote: |
| Payments after you leave (C05) | Partial 5/10 The terms say what is handed back within 14 days of termination, but no page says whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: | Full 10/10 The terms of service say the agency's only compensation is commission on revenue generated during the management engagement, which excludes income earned after the engagement ends. Quote: |
| Account access (C06) | Partial 5/10 The ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts and logins, while the terms say the agency will hand back account credentials in its possession on termination, so the pages differ on who holds credentials (E4). How the team accesses the accounts is not described. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The agency says it never asks for platform logins and the creator keeps control of the accounts. It does not describe how its team carries out the publishing and fan-messaging work it lists without account access. Quote: |
| Where the money goes (C07) | Partial 5/10 The contact FAQ says the agency handles all payment processing and pays the creator's 55% share weekly, so the commission is taken as a split. The site does not name the account where platform payouts land. Quote: | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Content rights (C08) | Full 10/10 The terms say intellectual property in creator content stays with the creator, that agency deliverables are licensed to the creator during the engagement, and that content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The site says the creator owns 100% of content made under management, during the agreement and after it ends. It does not say what happens to the agency's copies, licences or access at the end. Quote: |
| Contract text before signing (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement is published; the management agreement is provided after the introductory call. The terms of service publish labelled sections on fees and revenue split, term and termination, and intellectual property, and the management page has a table of key contract terms. Quote: | Partial 5/10 A labelled summary of key terms (commission, fees, term, content rights) is published. The sample management agreement is provided only after the strategy call, so the full text is not readable without applying (E3). Quote: |
| Company behind the brand (C10) | Full 10/10 The terms of service name Javór GmbH, trading as Foxy Studios, and give Switzerland as the country of registration. Other pages give Baar, Switzerland as headquarters. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site footer names the legal entity, Hush Talent Inc., and says it is incorporated in California, USA. No registration number is shown. Quote: |
| Dated history (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2021. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2023-02-05 (first Wayback capture 2023-04-07), more than 12 months later. The Swiss register entry for the operating company dates from 2025-03-12. Quote: | Not found 0/10 Not found on public pages (checked October 20, 2026) |
| Scope and fit (C12) | Full 10/10 The fees article lists what the 45% covers (24/7 chatting, content strategy, social media growth, PR, analytics, account protection with DMCA takedowns, burnout support and brand-deal facilitation) and says none of it is charged separately. It states a fit limit of creators already earning $10,000-$15,000 a month or more, and the ranking page says the agency is not built for brand-new creators. Quote: | Full 10/10 Inclusions are listed for each rate (content strategy, scheduling, publishing, audience growth and in-house production for full management; negotiation, contracting and usage rights for brand deals). The brand-deal rate excludes deals the agency did not source, and the apply page says applications are not accepted from some regions. Quote: |
Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.
Full evidence: Foxy Studios profile · Hush Talent profile · All comparisons · All commission rates
Cite this page
OF Agency Rankings: Foxy Studios vs Hush Talent, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/foxy-studios-vs-hush-talent/. Rubric v1.0.
Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.