Foxy Studios vs White Door Management: published terms compared, October 2026
As of October 23, 2026, Foxy Studios scores 7.1/10 (#7 of 31) and White Door Management scores 9.2/10 (#2) on the 12 published-terms criteria of OF Agency Rankings (5 vs 10 of 12 criteria in full).
How do Foxy Studios and White Door Management differ in published terms?
- Criteria: White Door Management publishes more than Foxy Studios on 6: price on the page (C01, in full vs in part), contract length and notice (C04, in full vs in part), payments after you leave (C05, in full vs in part), account access (C06, in full vs in part), where the money goes (C07, in full vs in part) and dated history (C11, in full vs in part). Foxy Studios publishes more than White Door Management on 1: what the percentage is taken from (C02, in full vs in part).
- Commission: Foxy Studios publishes standard flat split 45% of net; White Door Management publishes full account management 25–60% of net.
- No commission after you leave: White Door Management states it; Foxy Studios does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Payouts go to the creator: White Door Management states it; Foxy Studios does not state it in those words (see the key terms below).
- Notice to end: Foxy Studios: Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide); White Door Management: Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving.
- Company named on the site: Foxy Studios: Javór GmbH (Switzerland); White Door Management: Kasir Consulting LLC (Wyoming, United States).
Where they publish the same: commission taken from net earnings; no minimum term; the creator keeps the login; no charges besides the commission; no fixed term that renews itself.
Foxy Studios and White Door Management key terms side by side
| Term | Foxy Studios | White Door Management |
|---|---|---|
| Commission | Standard flat split 45% of net | Full account management 25–60% of net |
| Commission base | Net (after the platform fee) | Net (after the platform fee) |
| Other charges | None stated: terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split; fees article says no setup fees, retainers, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission; homepage says no penalties for leaving. | None: no upfront costs, no set-up fees, no other fees; 'The commission is the only charge.' Set-up, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and exit fees are listed as never billed on top. |
| Minimum term | None (month-to-month, no lock-in) | None (no minimum term) |
| Notice to end | Conflicting: 30 days' written notice by either party (terms, homepage FAQ); 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days (European creators guide) | Thirty days, in writing (an email is enough), either side; no penalty for leaving |
| Renewal / how the term continues | Month to month or rolling, ends on notice | No automatic renewal |
| Payments after you leave | Not stated. Terms say account credentials, content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. | None ('No commission on anything earned after the agreement ends.') |
| Account login | Pages differ: the ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts, content and logins; the terms say the agency hands back account credentials in its possession within 14 days of termination. How the team accesses accounts is not described. | Account, password, login email and two-step verification stay with the creator; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time (partners page names Infloww as the team's tool). |
| Where payouts land | Contact FAQ: the agency handles all processing and the creator receives a 55% share weekly; the fees article describes monthly reconciliation against OnlyFans payout statements. The account where platform payouts land is not named. | Platform pays directly into the creator's own bank account; the agency never receives or holds payouts and invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. |
| Country | Switzerland (headquarters stated as Baar) | United States (Wyoming LLC with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming) |
The 12 criteria side by side
| Criterion | Foxy Studios | White Door Management |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.1/10 | 9.2/10 |
| Rank | #7 of 31 | #2 of 31 |
| Criteria C01–C12 | published, 0 not found | published, 0 not found |
| Band | Publishes some key terms | Publishes most key terms |
| Price on the page (C01) | Partial 5/10 The standard rate is published: the agency takes 45% and the creator keeps 55%. An elite tier with improved splits for creators earning $50,000+/month is offered without a figure, and the fees article describes unpriced bespoke terms at about $150,000+/month. The same FAQ says 55/45 is the only split and applies to every creator (E4). Quote: | Full 10/10 White Door publishes a commission of 25–60% of net earnings. One range covers its only service, full account management; there is no separate price list per service, and the exact rate is set in the written agreement before signing. Quote: |
| What the percentage is taken from (C02) | Full 10/10 The fees article says the 45% is taken from post-OnlyFans revenue (what remains after the platform's 20%), gives worked examples on the whole post-platform amount, and says PPV is included at the standard split with no separate PPV commission. Chargebacks come out of gross before the split. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The base is stated: net earnings, meaning what reaches the creator after the platform's share, invoiced on the net earnings shown in the platform's own statement for the period. Which income types the commission covers (subscriptions, messages, tips, other) is not stated. Quote: |
| Other charges (C03) | Full 10/10 The site says the split is the whole pricing model: the terms say there are no upfront retainers or charges on top of the split, and the fees article says there are no setup fees, software fees, marketing surcharges or separate PPV commission and that everything listed is covered by the 45%. The homepage says there are no penalties for leaving. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site states that there are no upfront costs, set-up fees or other fees and that the commission is the only charge. It lists set-up fees, leak removal, reports and calls, software and tools, and any exit fee, penalty or commission after the end as never billed on top. Quote: |
| Contract length and notice (C04) | Partial 5/10 The terms say Foxy works on a month-to-month basis, so the agreement continues each month until notice is given. They also say there is no long-term lock-in and either party may end the agreement with 30 days' written notice, and the homepage FAQ repeats the 30 days. A guide for European creators instead gives 14 days' notice on either side during the first 90 days. The notice periods therefore differ between pages (E4). Quote: | Full 10/10 No minimum term; either side can end the agreement with thirty days' notice in writing (an email is enough); the site says there is no automatic renewal. Quote: |
| Payments after you leave (C05) | Partial 5/10 The terms say what is handed back within 14 days of termination, but no page says whether any commission continues on income earned after the agreement ends. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site states that no commission is charged on anything earned after the agreement ends; commission applies only to net earnings up to the end of the agreement. Quote: |
| Account access (C06) | Partial 5/10 The ranking and management pages say creators keep their accounts and logins, while the terms say the agency will hand back account credentials in its possession on termination, so the pages differ on who holds credentials (E4). How the team accesses the accounts is not described. Quote: | Full 10/10 The creator keeps the password, login email and two-step verification; the agency never asks for the password. The team works through team access the creator grants through the platform's own tools and can revoke at any time. Quote: |
| Where the money goes (C07) | Partial 5/10 The contact FAQ says the agency handles all payment processing and pays the creator's 55% share weekly, so the commission is taken as a split. The site does not name the account where platform payouts land. Quote: | Full 10/10 Platform payouts go directly to the creator's own bank account and the agency never receives or holds them; the agency invoices its commission afterwards, based on the platform's statement for the period. Quote: |
| Content rights (C08) | Full 10/10 The terms say intellectual property in creator content stays with the creator, that agency deliverables are licensed to the creator during the engagement, and that content libraries and other materials in the agency's possession are handed back within 14 days of termination. Quote: | Full 10/10 Content belongs to the creator and is used only to run the account, in approved ways, while the agreement runs. At the end the team's access is removed, the voice guide, fan notes and price list are handed back, and the agency's copies are deleted, except records the law requires, such as invoices. Quote: |
| Contract text before signing (C09) | Partial 5/10 No sample agreement is published; the management agreement is provided after the introductory call. The terms of service publish labelled sections on fees and revenue split, term and termination, and intellectual property, and the management page has a table of key contract terms. Quote: | Partial 5/10 The site publishes a sample term sheet as a page, with eleven numbered sections (parties, scope, commission, invoicing, term and notice, exit, ownership, confidentiality, content protection, data, individual agreement), readable without a form. It describes itself as a plain-language summary of the standard terms; the individual terms and the full agreement are sent after a first conversation. Quote: |
| Company behind the brand (C10) | Full 10/10 The terms of service name Javór GmbH, trading as Foxy Studios, and give Switzerland as the country of registration. Other pages give Baar, Switzerland as headquarters. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site names the operating company, Kasir Consulting LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, with an address in Sheridan, Wyoming, on the company page, the legal notice, the privacy policy, the term sheet and the footer of every page. Quote: |
| Dated history (C11) | Partial 5/10 The site says the agency was founded in 2021. The earliest public record found is the domain registration on 2023-02-05 (first Wayback capture 2023-04-07), more than 12 months later. The Swiss register entry for the operating company dates from 2025-03-12. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site states that its team has worked in OnlyFans management since 2021 and has operated as White Door Management since 2026. The earliest record of the agency we found is the registration of its domain, whitedoormgmt.com, on 2026-10-21 (registry RDAP), inside the 12-month window of the stated 2026 start. No web-archive copy exists. The formation date of Kasir Consulting LLC could not be seen (register behind human verification). Quote: |
| Scope and fit (C12) | Full 10/10 The fees article lists what the 45% covers (24/7 chatting, content strategy, social media growth, PR, analytics, account protection with DMCA takedowns, burnout support and brand-deal facilitation) and says none of it is charged separately. It states a fit limit of creators already earning $10,000-$15,000 a month or more, and the ranking page says the agency is not built for brand-new creators. Quote: | Full 10/10 The site lists what the single commission includes (24/7 inbox in the creator's voice, voice guide, pricing, growth on approved channels, daily note and weekly report, content protection, onboarding, switching and exit help, English and German) and states exclusions and fit limits: no content production, no single services such as leak removal on their own, OnlyFans and Fansly only, and no accounts that would need platform rules bent. Quote: |
Measures how much an agency publishes, not how well it performs or whether it can be trusted.
Full evidence: Foxy Studios profile · White Door Management profile · All comparisons · All commission rates
Cite this page
OF Agency Rankings: Foxy Studios vs White Door Management, published by Fan Fusion LLC (operator of a ranked agency), data checked October 20–23, 2026, https://ofagencyrankings.com/compare/foxy-studios-vs-white-door-management/. Rubric v1.0.
Text and data are licensed CC BY 4.0. When you reuse them, please keep the publisher disclosure: Ownership: this site and the OnlyFans management agency Fan Fusion have the same owner (Fan Fusion LLC). Every agency, Fan Fusion included, is scored by the same 12 published criteria.